MENZIES BEFORE THE LIBERAL PARTY
THE YOUNG MENZIES
Success, Failure, Resilience 1894–1942
edited by Zachary Gorman.
Melbourne University Press, 2022
224 pages, $49.95
After a brilliant career at the Melbourne bar in the 1920s and a period as Victoria’s Attorney-General, Sir Robert Gordon Menzies eventually became the most towering federal parliamentarian ever seen in Australian politics. But up to now, few books, even including Allan Martin’s magisterial two-volume biography, published in 1993 and 1999 respectively, have dealt in any length or clarity with Menzies childhood, personality, and early adulthood.
The Young Menzies: Success, Failure, Resilience 1894-1942explores the formative period of Menzies’s life, when his personal and political beliefs that helped make modern Australia were being moulded. A number of contributors to this fine collection examine the context and origins of Menzies’s ideas and principles that he would later put into powerful political practice when he returned to the prime ministership in 1949. It was these principles, Menzies claimed,to which he attempted to adhere for his sixteen more years while leading Australia’s governing Liberal/Country Party coalition.
The Young Menzies also deals with the many difficulties Menzies faced when, as leader of the United Australia Party, he first attained our highest office in 1939. This prime ministership occurred at a time when the nation’s primary focus was on survival. It was only after ignominiously losing power in 1941 that Menzies was given the impetus and capacity for self-reflection to develop a detailed vision for post-war Australia. This led him to establish The Liberal Party of Australia in the mid 1940s, and then to become our longest-serving prime minister. Menzies record of slightly over eighteen years in office seems unlikely to be equalled, let alone surpassed.
In a Foreword to The Young Menzies, Geoffrey Blainey points out that Menzies rural hometown, Jeparit, about 350 kilometres north-west of Melbourne, had “few cultural amenities except the churches. Even the town library – in the year when he was learning to talk – held a mere 247 volumes.” At a time when religion permeated education and politics, as a youth Menzies absorbed the hymns and religious ideology of Methodism and especially of Presbyterianism, becoming as he later wrote “well-schooled in the Bible.” David Furse-Roberts, author of a book published in 2021, God & Menzies, canvasses the above in a useful chapter entitled “ A Simple Presbyterianism in Politics.”
The Young Menziesis ably edited byhistorianDr Zachary Gorman – the academic coordinator at Melbourne University’s Robert Menzies Institute. This illuminating anthology covers Menzies’ life from his birth in the back of the family’s general store in a small country town in December 1894 to his evocative The Forgotten People radio broadcast, which he delivered in May 1942.
As well as Furse-Roberts, contributors to this well-indexed and beautifully produced book are, in alphabetical order,Frank Bongiorno, Troy Bramston, Judith Brett, Nick Cater, Anne Henderson, David Kemp, Greg Melleuish and Scott Prasser. In addition, Justice James Edelman and Angela Kittikhoun co-author a fascinating chapter on “Menzies and the Law.”
As befits a book of ten, often disparate, scholarly essays, The Young Menzies begins with an informed assessment of the existing historiography surrounding Menzies and his views about Australian liberalism. This is written by Liberal Party stalwart and prolific historian, David Kemp.
Troy Bramston’s contribution, “Young Robert” is extremely revealing. In 2019 Bramston had published a detailed biographical study, RobertMenzies: The Art of Politics which covered Menzies childhood and experiences as a youth.
Close to his mother but often distant from hisfather, both of whom prized hard work, thrift, education, self-reliance and public duty, the young Menzies (who was the fourth of five children) started formal schooling in June 1898. This was at the local state primary school in the dusty wheat town of his birth. Bramston explains that Menzies – a keen and able student – was only able to further his education by winning scholarships to study at schools in Ballarat, at the prestigious Wesley College in Melbourne, and then, in 1913, at the University of Melbourne. In fact, Menzies’ upbringing in dusty country Victoria could not be further, Bramston writes, “from the establishment youth into which his later contemporaries in the law and politics were born. There was no family fortune and few connections.”
Shortly after he began studying for a Batchelor of Laws, Menzies made a seminal decision not to enlist in the First World War. His strict father and doting mother had insisted that, as his two elder brothers Les and Frank, were fighting abroad, he should remain in Melbourne to look after the family. Being branded a coward for not enlisting, had, young Robert said, “ a very searing effect on my mind.”
Bramston maintains that, as a direct result of his failure to enlist, Menzies “decided to go into politics, viewing it as ‘public service of some kind’, to erase the perceived stain on his name.” This attempt to validate his existence, it seems clear, was the dominating reason that propelled Menzies to stand for parliament and to begin a long, sometimes turbulent, and eventually hugely successful, political career.
Although essentially a moderate, Menzies who was an avid reader, enthusiastically advocated many causes. As Greg Melleuish and Judith Brett respectively explain,these included the importance of liberal education and of higher education, of civic values and political liberalism, and the value of the Australian federation. Other passions, enumerated by Scott Prasser, were loyalty to Great Britain and the crucial role of home ownership and private property. He was not enamoured by the notion of provision of public housing and especially of any government enforced re-distribution of wealth.
As The Young Menzies makes clear, Menzies was a master of the medium of radio, which he loved, and used to massive positive effect. The thirty-seven broadcast essays that comprised The Forgotten People and Other Studies in Democracy, published in 1943, were distributed widely throughout Australia by Angus & Robertson, which was based in Sydney.As Nick Cater states, these published radio broadcasts “were arguably the most important intellectual contribution to Australian politics since Federation.” They articulated the principles of Australian liberalism: individual freedom; equal dignity; equality of opportunity rather than equal outcomes; personal and community responsibility; the family and the family home as the primary unit of social cohesion; the rule of law; constitutional parliamentary governance; economic prosperity, and progress-driven private enterprise motivated by reward for effort. According to Cater, they also set the terms for the democratisation of university education, which occurred in earnest under Menzies from 1957 to 1966. The latter was when, with the aid of a Commonwealth Scholarship, I completed a BA Honours degree, studying History, Politics and Economics at Monash University.
Cater wisely argues that the ideas that buttress The Forgotten People represent an utter and explicit rejection of the leftist notion of “competing social classes with clashing economic interests.” As he summarises the situation,“The class divide, in so far as Menzies will allow it, pits an enterprising and industrial middle class without inherited privilege against a capital-owning upper class and an organised working class.” In many ways, this is similar to the ideas of Britain’s later long-serving Conservative Party prime minister, Margaret Thatcher.
According to Cater,Menzies’ thirty-seven radio talks form “ a succinct summary of a political philosophy” that he “augmented and amplified…in countless speeches over the next three decades of public life.” His ideas certainlyhelped shape post-war Australia through their repeated endorsement of what Cater accurately categorises as “the power of the individual, the limited role of the state, the social and economic benefits of private enterprise, the primacy of democracy, and governance by consent.’
A highlight of The Young Menzies is Anne Henderson’s chapter, which is simply titled “Peace and War.” Author of Menzies at War, published in 2014, Anne Henderson is Deputy-Director of The Sydney Institute. Its director, her husband Gerard Henderson, wrote Menzies’ Child, a helpful history of The Liberal Party of Australia from 1944 until 1994, the year of publication.As a result of interviews with Menzies daughter, Heather Henderson, and with Menzies wife Dame Pattie Menzies, this book does deal in considerable detail with the young Menzies.
In her excellent contribution to this current, fascinating book, Anne Henderson demolishes the myth that Labor luminary and later prime minister, John Curtin, was not an appeaser. Henderson argues persuasively that(in some ways like Robert Menzies) until Australia went to war, Curtin actively tried to avoid armed conflict with Nazi Germany. Indeed, throughout the 1930s Curtin was still a pacifist and also someone who believed that the ruling class had “a vested interest in war and war-making.” As a consequence, when in Opposition as leader of the federal Labor Party, Curtin opposed every initiative of Joseph Lyons and then, in April 1939, of the Menzies UAP government to increase Australian defence expenditure.
Henderson reveals that, as a person and a politician, Curtin the pacifist believed that “war, if it came, would be the work of international profiteers and not the result of the expansionist ambitions of Germany’s arch dictator Adolf Hitler. In other words, diplomacy (also known derisively as ‘appeasement’) was needed, and diplomacy should push on, regardless of the failure of the Munich Agreement of late 1938.”
The truth is that, before the Nazis invaded Poland in late August 1939, the overriding pressure on government politicians of all stripes was to avoid war.This was with the conspicuous exception of a few dissidents, most notably Winston Churchill in England and W.H. (‘Billy’) Hughes in Australia. Moreover, as Henderson explains it was not until well into 1940 that Labor, under Curtin, supported Menzies’ commitment in early September 1939 to send troops to Europe to fight Hitler. On 16 November 1939, as Opposition leader, Curtin had told the House of Representatives, “there is some hope of peace being negotiated…In many places where influence is exerted some endeavour has been made to see if, even at this terrible stage, it is not practicable to resolve the situation without prolonging or continuing the war.” For Curtin, and for Menzies, thisforlorn hope was misplaced.
Until his resignation as UAP leader in August 1941 Menzies presided over a relatively effective wartime government. While his first term as prime minister was racked withdivisions in the UAP, as Henderson explains,Menzies “was successful in continuing the work of the Lyons government in strengthening Australia’s war preparedness.” Indeed, as Australia’s new prime minister, the ex-socialist Curtin generously acknowledged the strong inheritance he had received from Menzies.
The statement above is supported by Frank Bongiorno in his fascinating, but to my mind ambiguously named chapter “Menzies and Curtin at War.” In the National Library of Australia there is a handwritten letter, dated 7 November 1941, from John Curtin to Menzies – who was by then a backbencher. Addressed to ‘Dear Bob’, Curtin noted that in a cable he had received from Winston Churchill, the British prime minister had concluded his observations with the message: “Give my regards to Mr Menzies. I am so glad he is on your War Council.” Curtin continued, “I thought you would like to know that.”
Bongiorno justifiably states that “The voluminous writings on Robert Menzies and John Curtin are agreed on one thing : that their relations were cordial and courteous.” Thus, even though Menzies was mainly a pragmatic, middle class, anti-communist, Scots Presbyterian and Curtin an often idealistic, working class, factionally-conscious, of Irish Catholic background, they always treated each other with considerable civility. According to Menzies, “in the years we faced one another across the chamber, we met and spoke regularly, and Curtin …loved nothing more than a personal discussion which had no particular relationship to the business before the House.”
Australia’s national prosperity that emerged in the 1950s and early 1960s, owed much, Bongiorno argues, “ to the dynamic of Menzies’s wartime relationship with Curtin, and the legacies of Labor’s post-Depression economic and social vision.” The latter had been implemented by Curtin as prime minister and to a lesser extent by Ben Chifley.But the policies implemented by these Labor leaders arguably provided a firm base for the long, and in the main, economically successful Menzies era.
Menzies remarkable stint as prime minister from 1949 to 1966 leading a long-standing, but occasionally divided, conservative coalition government and his role in the development of political liberalism in Australia will be canvassed in three more anthologies. These books, to be published by MUP, are to be the result of other academic conferences in Melbourne, convened by the Robert Menzies Institute.
Ross Fitzgerald is Emeritus Professor of History and Politics at Griffith University. His recent books include the co-authored Grafton Everest political satire, The Lowest Depths,in which Russia’s malevolent president-for- life,Vladimir Putrid, is assassinated; a memoirFifty Years Sober: An Alcoholic’s Journey; and My Last Drink: 32 stories of recovering alcoholics, co-edited with Neal Price and published by Connor Court.
QUADRANT March 2023 pp 90-92.
Leave your response!